The first thing Anna noticed wasn’t the resignation.
It was the silence afterward.
Her colleague, Sam, a fifth-year associate, was just gone. No goodbye email and no announcement. No explanation was offered in the hallway or behind closed doors.
One day, Sam’s door was closed because he was in a meeting. The next day, it was closed because he wasn’t coming back.
Anna Martinez is also a fifth-year associate at MSL. She is smart, dependable, and responsive. The kind of mid-level associate that partners trust to get things done without supervision. However, recently, people like her have been leaving.
Anna replayed the weeks leading up to Sam’s departure. He hadn’t complained, seemed burned out, or requested flexibility or accommodations.
If anything, Sam had been doing exactly what the firm rewarded: keeping his head down, billing many hours, remaining responsive to partners and clients, and delivering excellent work.
Which is why Sam’s exit hit Anna so hard.
Anna couldn’t understand why Sam left. Sam was a hard worker, kept his head down, billed a ton of hours, and seemed to be doing everything the senior partners expected of him. So why did he leave? If Sam doesn’t see his future at MSL, should I? What does he know that I don’t?
No one talked about why he left. Just silence. MSL kept moving. His work was reassigned as if he had never been there.
Anna found herself unsettled and unsure about her future at MSL. Would they notice or care if she were gone, too?
No one discussed what mid-level associates were supposed to be working toward.
No discussion emerged about what success at this stage looked like beyond just billing and being dependable. No clear plan for becoming a partner. No understanding of who, anyone, was responsible for helping mid-level associates develop beyond just completing assignments.
At the same time, down the hall, in an office that stayed lit long after most floors had gone dark, Margaret was noticing the same pattern from a different vantage point.
Margaret Lewis had spent fifteen years in HR at MSL, long enough to know when departures were random and when they were patterned. She noticed a pattern among the mid-level associates who left MSL. They weren’t upset, frustrated, or demanding change. They just left.
She watched exit interviews grow quieter. Conversations became shorter. Mid-level associates stopped asking how to become a partner, who could help them develop, or what the firm expected of them.
It appeared they assumed there was nothing left to learn at MSL.
The weight of that assumption settled on her shoulders. She wasn’t sure what to make of this pattern or how to fix it.
She knew this wasn’t a compensation, perk, motivation, or hiring problem.
And then there was Jason Bellows, one of the MSL’s most senior partners. Jason is a builder, rainmaker, and someone for whom the old system had worked exactly as promised.
Jason was asking himself a different question entirely: Why was the old work style of keeping your head down, billing many hours, being relentlessly responsive, and delivering excellent work no longer enough to keep mid-level associates engaged, fulfilled, and at the firm?
That night, Anna didn’t update her résumé. Not yet. But she did start paying closer attention to who stayed, who left, what was said, and what went unsaid.
For the first time since joining the firm, she allowed herself to ask a question she hadn’t known how to articulate.
“If no one can explain the rules anymore… how am I supposed to decide whether to keep playing the game?”
This wasn’t about a single resignation. It was about…
© 2026 Susan B. Silverman. All rights reserved.