Margaret noticed the change, just as Anna had. She observed it during meetings that now lasted a few minutes longer and in partners choosing their words more carefully. Their sentences now included words like development, trajectory, and next stage, spoken without irony or apology. The language had improved, but the underlying assumptions remained the same.
Margaret watched a practice-group discussion where a partner asked a mid-level associate what kind of work she wanted to develop. The question was well received. Heads nodded, and notes were taken.
Then the meeting continued without follow-up, ownership, or a clear plan for next steps. Margaret felt a familiar tightening in her chest. She had spent years translating the firm’s culture into something people could live by. She understood how change worked here, slowly, through conversation and consensus rather than mandates.
This felt different because the people listening most closely were not the partners. They were the Annas. Margaret thought specifically about Anna, how steady, trusted, and quietly capable she was. How she never overplayed her hand or demanded attention. How she did her work and waited for the system to recognize her efforts. She also considered how dangerous the waiting had become and the risk of losing Anna and other mid-level associates.
Margaret had seen this pattern before. First, language changes, expectations become blurry, and nothing structural changes. The firm then congratulates itself on being thoughtful, responsive, and human. Ultimately, somewhere between intention and infrastructure, someone decides to leave.
Not angrily or dramatically. They would just… leave quietly.
Margaret replayed recent conversations in her head. Partners asked better questions but did not agree on who owned the answers. Mentoring was discussed but never formalized. Development was acknowledged but not designed. Everyone seemed to assume the path would sort itself out, that if enough thoughtful conversations occurred, associates would somehow figure out their path forward at MSL.
Margaret knew better.
When the path was left to sort itself out, it didn’t do so evenly.
It favored the loudest voices, the most confident assumptions, and the people who already knew how to navigate ambiguity because the system had been built by and for them.
People like Anna waited, but waiting was not neutral.
Margaret sat alone in her office after the day had quieted, the firm still humming softly around her. She thought about Sam and how long he must have waited, deciding it was safer than staying.
She could now clearly see the risk: the firm was confusing movement with progress, conversation with direction, and good intentions with a plan.
If it continued, the firm wouldn’t lose people because they lacked commitment; it would lose them because the firm hadn’t given them anything solid to commit to.
Margaret reached for her notebook and opened it, not to record impressions, but to write a single sentence at the top of a blank page:
Assumption is not a development strategy.
She underlined it.
This wasn’t about having better conversations. It was about creating something people could truly understand and follow.
Margaret closed her notebook and leaned back.
She understood what was coming next.
Not an announcement or a task force, but a search for a way to turn effort into direction before the firm lost someone it still had time to keep.
The MSL Saga™, MLARD™, and the 85/15 Model™ are trademarks of Susan B. Silverman Consulting. The MSL Saga and all episodes © 2026 Susan B. Silverman Consulting. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution is prohibited.
